首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月08日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Juvenile Justice in Different Cultural Contexts: A Comparison of India and Germany
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Prof. Dr. Bernd-Dieter Meier, Hannover ; Assistant Prof. Abhijit D. Vasmatkar, B.Sc., LL.M., NET, Pune
  • 期刊名称:Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik
  • 印刷版ISSN:1863-6470
  • 出版年度:2011
  • 卷号:2011
  • 期号:06
  • 出版社:Editors of ZIS
  • 摘要:Comparing the juvenile justice systems of two countries which do not share a common cultural background is a difficult and demanding enterprise. A comparison of two legal systems in general and of juvenile justice in particular, however, is at the same time a challenge and an opportunity for research. It is obvious that some social problems are very similar all over the world, irrespective of the particular cultural context, deviant behaviour being one of them. In a situation like this, it is of major interest to see in which way a given society reacts to these problems and what consequences follow. From an academic point of view the situation can be compared to a large-scale sociological field experiment, because the similarity of the problems allows us to study the outcomes of the specific forms of intervention and their assessment in the respective cultural context. A comparison of the juvenile justice systems of two countries as culturally different as India and Germany thus offers the chance to gain a better insight into the mechanisms of social control and the way deviant and illegal behaviour can be responded to by society. To observe that India and Germany are two very different countries comes near to a platitude. India, an independent nation since 1947, is the second-most populous country of the world with over 1.1 billion people, its share of the world population amounting to more than 17 %. About 30 % of the Indian population is in the age group 0 to 14 years, around 5 % older than 65 years. Until today, life in India has been shaped by its rich cultural traditions including a strong religious influence, about 80 % of the population being Hindus. According to the CIA World Factbook, the share of the urban population is 29 %, the literacy rate 71 %, and life expectancy at birth 66 years. Due to its colonial past India belongs to the common law system. Germany, on the other hand, is one of the biggest and richest countries of the European Union, but has a mere population of 82 million, which is slightly more than 1 % of the world population. Germany´s demographic structure is considerably different from India´s: Only about 13 % of its people belong to the age group 0 to 14, whereas 20 % are 65 years or older. By religion, Germany is a Christian country, about 1/3 of the population being protestant, 1/3 Roman Catholic and 1/3 unaffiliated or other. The share of the urban population is 74 %, the literacy rate 99 %, and life expectancy at birth 79 years. Germany´s legal tradition is clearly shaped by the civil law system. It might be deduced from these figures that juvenile delinquency and juvenile justice play a major role in India whereas the low percentage of young people and the high literacy rate in Germany might be indicators that these topics are of minor importance only in Europe. However, the opposite is true. Germany like most Western states has a relatively high amount of juvenile delinquency registered by the police, illegal behaviour of young people being considered a major social problem which must be responded to by the state in a determined way. India, on the other hand, with its different sociodemographic structure (median age in India 25.9 years, in contrast to 44.3 years in Germany) has a relatively low level of juvenile delinquency, young people not playing a major role in the criminal justice statistics. In the following, we would like to contribute some observations on the obvious disparities and similarities between the legal concepts which have been enacted to respond to young persons´ illegal behaviour in both states. The objective of the article is a comparison of the two juvenile justice systems in their respective historical and cultural contexts. The comparison, however, can be a snap-shot of the present day situation only, since India is a dynamic and fast developing country; the social situation as well as the legal framework may change rapidly.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有