首页    期刊浏览 2025年07月14日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:教師の教育的態度のQ方法論的研究 [in Japanese] A Q-study of the educational attitudes of teachers. [in Japanese]
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:徳田 安俊/Tokuda Yasutoshi
  • 期刊名称:教育心理学研究
  • 印刷版ISSN:0021-5015
  • 电子版ISSN:2186-3075
  • 出版年度:1962
  • 卷号:10
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:90-98
  • 出版社:The Japanese Association of Educational Psychology
  • 摘要:

    The purpose of this paper is to study the basic factors behind educational attitudes by the Q-technique. As an instrument, Fred N. Kerlinger's Q-sort statements were used, somewhat revised to adapt for Japanese teachers. The original 80 item Q-sort had been constructed according to the following paradigm : (A) Attitudes (1) Restrictive-Traditional (2) Permissive-Progressive (B) Areas (a) Teaching-Subject matter-Curriculum (b) Interpersonal Relations (k) Normative-Social (m) Authority-Discipline Thirty-one subjects, consisting of six university professors in Education, six university professors in Psychology, eight elementary school teachers, five junior high school teachers, five senior high school teachers and one layman, were asked to sort 80-statements on an approval-disapproval dimension. Each subject's sort was analyzed with a factorial analysis of variance. As was expected, all the professors' educational attitudes were "permissive" at 1% level, and the other subjects were multifarious in their educational attitudes. About half of the latter had high F-ratios in the permissive direction and the rest had low F-ratios in the permissive or restrictive direction. Twenty-two subjects' sorts were intercorrelated and the resulting correlation matrix was factor-analyzed. Orthogonally rotated factors, I, II and III were named "Progressivism", "Traditionalism" and "Psychology" respectively. A Spearman rank order coefficient of correlation was computed between the attitudes F-ratios and the factors. The rhos were .86, -.24 and .44 for I, II and III respectively.

国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有