首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月07日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Validity and usefulness of members reports of implementation progress in a quality improvement initiative: findings from the Team Check-up Tool (TCT)
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Kitty S Chan ; Yea-Jen Hsu ; Lisa H Lubomski
  • 期刊名称:Implementation Science
  • 印刷版ISSN:1748-5908
  • 电子版ISSN:1748-5908
  • 出版年度:2011
  • 卷号:6
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:115
  • DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-6-115
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:Team-based interventions are effective for improving safety and quality of healthcare. However, contextual factors, such as team functioning, leadership, and organizational support, can vary significantly across teams and affect the level of implementation success. Yet, the science for measuring context is immature. The goal of this study is to validate measures from a short instrument tailored to track dynamic context and progress for a team-based quality improvement (QI) intervention. Design: Secondary cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of data from a clustered randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a team-based quality improvement intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in intensive care units (ICUs). Setting: Forty-six ICUs located within 35 faith-based, not-for-profit community hospitals across 12 states in the U.S. Population: Team members participating in an ICU-based QI intervention. Measures: The primary measure is the Team Check-up Tool (TCT), an original instrument that assesses context and progress of a team-based QI intervention. The TCT is administered monthly. Validation measures include CLABSI rate, Team Functioning Survey (TFS) and Practice Environment Scale (PES) from the Nursing Work Index. Analysis: Temporal stability, responsiveness and validity of the TCT. We found evidence supporting the temporal stability, construct validity, and responsiveness of TCT measures of intervention activities, perceived group-level behaviors, and barriers to team progress. The TCT demonstrates good measurement reliability, validity, and responsiveness. By having more validated measures on implementation context, researchers can more readily conduct rigorous studies to identify contextual variables linked to key intervention and patient outcomes and strengthen the evidence base on successful spread of efficacious team-based interventions. QI teams participating in an intervention should also find data from a validated tool useful for identifying opportunities to improve their own implementation.
  • 关键词:Hand Hygiene ; Quality Improvement Intervention ; Leadership Support ; Quality Improvement Team ; Quality Improvement Collaborative
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有