首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月27日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:‘You Can't Stop Undergraduates Asking Silly Questions’: Academics' Views on Submission of Undergraduate Student Projects for Ethical Review
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Jenny Scott ; Karen Rodham ; Gordon Taylor
  • 期刊名称:Research Ethics
  • 印刷版ISSN:1747-0161
  • 电子版ISSN:2047-6094
  • 出版年度:2008
  • 卷号:4
  • 期号:4
  • 页码:147-151
  • DOI:10.1177/174701610800400404
  • 出版社:SAGE Publications
  • 摘要:Undergraduate projects may contribute new knowledge, but commonly their main purpose is an exercise in learning and applying simple research methods. They are usually short term and a first step into the research field. Support for undergraduate research experience is simple enough. However, integral to the research process is ethical scrutiny. A high standard of conduct of research is essential. The question of whether undergraduate student projects should be subject to full ethical review, to the same extent as that undertaken for full scale academic work, is a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to explore the views of academics on the nature and extent of ethical review considered appropriate for undergraduate research projects. This was done in order to identify which side of the above debate was favoured. Participants were undergraduate research project supervisors, drawn from a range of disciplines where research on human subjects is undertaken. A series of focus groups were undertaken, transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis. There was general consensus that some consideration should be given to the ethical issues relating to student projects. However, participants were limited in their explicit identification of such issues, with only extreme examples being specifically described. Some favoured a ‘light touch’ proportional to the size of the project as appropriate, while others considered the level ethical scrutiny not related to the size, duration or outcome of the work. Opinions were divided on where responsibility ultimately lay. Some considered it to belong at departmental, faculty or institutional level, but others held the individual supervisor accountable. The degree of involvement of undergraduate research in ethical review and approval is clearly an issue amongst academics. This study helps raise awareness of these issues and promotes debate on the appropriate level and format of review needed for undergraduate research training.
  • 关键词:ethical review ; research ; undergraduate student projects
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有