首页    期刊浏览 2025年06月23日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The Conundrum of Providing Authoritative Online Consumer Health Information: Current Research and Implications for Information Professionals
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Diane M. Neal
  • 期刊名称:Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  • 印刷版ISSN:1931-6550
  • 出版年度:2010
  • 卷号:36
  • 期号:4
  • 出版社:American Society for Information Science and Technology
  • 摘要:How do we know when to trust online health information? Recently, a gynecologist’s newspaper column asserted that endometriosis, a disease that primarily affects women, could be diagnosed by an in-office exam and that ovarian cysts could be diagnosed by an ultrasound. These claims are not true; these conditions can only be diagnosed through a surgical procedure. After being informed about the article through social networking outlets, many outraged endometriosis patients – including me – posted comments online in reply to the doctor’s article (until the newspaper swiftly closed the comments) and wrote letters to the editor. They published one letter to the editor: mine. Lay endometriosis bloggers announced my letter's publication on their blogs, declaring a small but significant victory in the battle against endometriosis information, and other patients also reveled in the celebration by commenting on the blog posts. Inexperienced in this form of activism, I asked a blogger why she thought my letter was published, but not anybody else’s. I thought perhaps they chose it because the column was published in a Canadian newspaper, and I live in Canada. She said she thought it was because I had a PhD, which added authority to my correction. We will never know for sure why the editors chose my letter, but something about it must have captured their attention.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有