文章基本信息

标题：Creating Websites: Adobe Go Live vs. LiveText
本地全文：下载
作者：Donna F. Herring ; Charles E. Notar ; Judy McEntyre 等
期刊名称：Computer and Information Science
印刷版ISSN：1913-8989
电子版ISSN：1913-8997
出版年度：2008
卷号：1
期号：3
页码：100
DOI：10.5539/cis.v1n3P100
出版社：Canadian Center of Science and Education
摘要：Normal 0 7.8 ? 0 2 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4  /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:????; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} This article reports student comments regarding their experiences in developing a website as part of a federally funded educational technology grant. The primary goal of the grant was to create a program where pre-service teachers developed competency in the use of technology for the academic success of their students. The students during the three year grant constructed websites for two years using Adobe Go Live and one year using LiveText. The two vehicles were compared on Ease of Use, Appearance, and Content with LiveText being preferred.