摘要：The current issue of William James Studies is dedicated to challenging James’s ethics as argued by Robert Talisse and Scott Aikin. The debate began as a conference paper-response for the 2010 Central Division meeting of the American Philosophical Association. It has herein been expanded to include more interlocutors and a reply to them by Talisse/Aikin. The heart of the debate focuses on whether James’s ethics can hold to the pragmatic injunction to remain true to experience. Talisse/Aikin believe that it cannot, and they put forth three challenges. First, they believe that James’s reliance on the contention
