摘要：As pointed out by Comrie (1976: 6 and 11), there is no generally accepted terminology in treatments of aspect. On the one hand, different authors apply different labels to the same concept; on the other hand, the same term is often used to refer to different concepts. In this paper I will try to clarify the terminological confusion concerning aspectual distinctions in the linguistic literature, where the pair of terms “telic”/“atelic”, “bounded”/“unbounded” are frequently used as synonyms. More specifically, I will focus on the treatment of lexical aspect in FG, where the telicity parameter is not consistently applied
