摘要：The interpretation points out the function of the kerygma in some of Georges Bernanos’ most famous novels. The goal is an interpellation of the transcendence as a defining difference of the inter-diction: neither the already spoken, neither the gift of a speech the meaning of which is hidden in the common word. The affirmation of what is not affirmable in itself is rather a state of absence and of silence which is instituted by the unspeakable, expressed however as a witness in an interdiction zone, relieving the paradoxical discourse where the unspoken looks for a statute inside the language.
