摘要：As a graduate student during the late 1960s, I - like many of you - had Don Campbell as a virtual teacher. His influence was most salient in my methods courses. We read, studied, and were examined on unobtrusive or nonreactive measures, quasi-experimental designs, multiple operationism (better known, perhaps, as [methodological] triangulation), internal and external validity, convergent an~ disciminant validation, regression-discontinuity design, and more. More generally, much of what made social science (and in· particular sociology and social psychology) science for my mentors could be traced to the contributions of Don Campbell. But it wasn't clear to them - or to me at that time - that the science Don was helping or trying to put into social science had two important features. First, it reflected and was relevant to the diversity and complexities of social life and culture. Second, it reflected a sophisticated post-positivist, anti-foundational understanding of the physical and natural sciences (hereafter, simply science for short) inheritance as complex, dynamic, ~nd processual social and cultural phenomena. For this reason, it may be that Don was partially responsible for putting me on the road to a critical sociology of science and a sociology of objectivity
