摘要：Meu principal objetivo neste artigo é analisar o problema da justifica..o moral para John Rawls a partir dos textos A Theory of Justice (TJ, IX, § 87), Political Liberalism (PL III, § 2), Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (JF I, § 9), The Law of Peoples (LoP I, § 1), “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics” (ODPE), “The Independence of Moral Theory” (IMT), “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical” (JFPnM). Minha inten..o é a de caracterizar a teoria da justi.a como equidade como um sistema coerentista de justifica..o que conta com uma epistemologia coerentista holística, uma teoria do contrato social que introduz uma ontologia social e uma estratégia pragmatista na teoria contratualista. No escopo deste trabalho, analisarei as características da epistemologia coerentista holística pressuposta e de como ela resolve os problemas de regresso epistêmico, dogmatismo, dualismo, assimetria e circularidade.
其他摘要：My main aim in this paper is to analyze the problem of moral justification in John Rawls`s works such as A Theory of Justice (TJ, IX, § 89), Political Liberalism (PL III, § 2), Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (JF I, § 9), The Law of Peoples (LoP I, § 1), “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics” (ODPE), “The Independence of Moral Theory” (IMT), “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical” (JFPnM). I wish to characterize the theory of justice as fairness as a coherentist system of justification, that relies with a holistic coherentist epistemology, a social contract theory that introduces a social ontology and a pragmatist strategy in the contractarian theory. In the scope of this work, I will analyze the core characteristics of the holistic coherentist epistemology presupposed and how its solve the problems of epistemic regress, dogmatism, dualism, asymmetry and circularity.?
