首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月30日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Human Genetic Biobanks in Asia: Politics of Trust and Scientific Advancement
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner
  • 期刊名称:SCRIPT-ed
  • 电子版ISSN:1744-2567
  • 出版年度:2010
  • 卷号:7
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:216-220
  • DOI:10.2966/scrip.070110.216
  • 出版社:AHRC Research Centre for Studies in Intellectual Property and Technology Law
  • 摘要:Biobanks are essential tools for genetic research, particularly genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and for the pharmaceutical industry for the translation of research findings into new products. Biobanks will also serve in the development of personalised medicine (The Royal Society, Personalised Medicine: Hopes and Realities (2005)). Jeroboams of printing ink have been devoted to the ethical, regulatory and social challenges associated with biobanks, particularly in relation to consent and privacy. Some scholars argue that the traditional consent model is simply too outdated for the genome era of high throughput genetic profiling and analysis, where entire populations can be genotyped in a matter of days and, future undefined research may be undertaken. There has been a focus shift to “governance” approaches to the administration, management, custodianship and security of biobanks. The establishment of increasing numbers of biobanks around the world has led to a rush of policy statements (NCI, First-Generation Guidelines for NCI-Supported BioRepositories (Washington DCL National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2006) and academic commentary debating the nature, form and content of the instruments needed to regulate this activity. In addition, some large-scale biobanks have developed their own governance frameworks (for example, UK Biobank. Ethics and Governance Framework, Version 2).
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有