期刊名称：Futhark : International Journal of Runic Studies
电子版ISSN：1892-0950
出版年度：2010
期号：1
页码：27-39
出版社：University of Oslo & Uppsala University
摘要：It is not difficult to find established interpretations of runestone texts that presuppose carving errors. Sometimes these are obvious, especially when we are dealing with common words like ‘raise’ or ‘stone’. But less common words such as names are often assumed to be miscarved too. The following examples may be cited, taken from the national corpus editions or other recognised published sources. Arbitrarily omitted runes: U 519 iRbrn GæiRbiǫrn N 210 hala helga U 838 þufr ÞōlfR Nä 12 s-ukn s[t]ȳksun Tumbo church stone faskr FastgæiRR/-gærðr (as interpreted by Jansson 1965, 14) U 729 tekr drængR U 865 …2ulfas Īgulfastr Vs 11† [kufri] Guðfriðr Ög 91 yuia Ōrǿkia Gs 13 lanklans læiðangr lands
