首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月22日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparative evaluation of kinetic, equilibrium and semi-equilibrium models for biomass gasification
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Buljit Buragohain ; Sankar Chakma ; Peeush Kumar
  • 期刊名称:International Journal of Energy and Environment
  • 印刷版ISSN:2076-2895
  • 电子版ISSN:2076-2909
  • 出版年度:2013
  • 卷号:4
  • 期号:4
  • 页码:581-614
  • 出版社:International Energy and Environment Foundation (IEEF)
  • 摘要:Modeling of biomass gasification has been an active area of research for past two decades. In the published literature, three approaches have been adopted for the modeling of this process, viz. thermodynamic equilibrium, semi-equilibrium and kinetic. In this paper, we have attempted to present a comparative assessment of these three types of models for predicting outcome of the gasification process in a circulating fluidized bed gasifier. Two model biomass, viz. rice husk and wood particles, have been chosen for analysis, with gasification medium being air. Although the trends in molar composition, net yield and LHV of the producer gas predicted by three models are in concurrence, significant quantitative difference is seen in the results. Due to rather slow kinetics of char gasification and tar oxidation, carbon conversion achieved in single pass of biomass through the gasifier, calculated using kinetic model, is quite low, which adversely affects the yield and LHV of the producer gas. Although equilibrium and semi-equilibrium models reveal relative insensitivity of producer gas characteristics towards temperature, the kinetic model shows significant effect of temperature on LHV of the gas at low air ratios. Kinetic models also reveal volume of the gasifier to be an insignificant parameter, as the net yield and LHV of the gas resulting from 6 m and 10 m riser is same. On a whole, the analysis presented in this paper indicates that thermodynamic models are useful tools for quantitative assessment of the gasification process, while kinetic models provide physically more realistic picture.

国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有