首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月30日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:William R. Newman: Promethean Ambitions: Alchemy and the Quest to Perfect Nature
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Joachim Schummer
  • 期刊名称:Hyle : International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry
  • 印刷版ISSN:1433-5158
  • 出版年度:2006
  • 卷号:12
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:154-156
  • 出版社:HYLE Publications, Karlsruhe and University of Karlsruhe
  • 摘要:Referring to the Whig Party, the former political opponents of the Tories in Great Britain, British historian Herbert Butterfield once coined the term 'Whig-gish' historiography for any account that looks at the past from the perspec-tive of the present, as if the goal of the past were the achievement of the pre-sent. Thus, a 'Whiggish' history of sci-ence carefully ignores everything of the past that does not suit the idea of a steady growth of science towards the current state. Strangely enough, that ap-proach has been prominent in philoso-phy too, from Hegel to recent philoso-phy science, so that we could equally speak of 'Hegelian historiography'. Because alchemy was driven by the belief in the transmutation of our ele-ments, it does not go well with the Whiggish historiography (and philoso-phy) of science. In this view, the labora-tory work of the alchemists was neither experimental, because they did not measure anything unlike their contem-porary astronomers, nor scientific, be-cause they were not seeking for mathe-matical theories unlike math teachers such as Galilei, nor technological, be-cause they were unsuccessful quacks and impostors. So, you better forget about this wrong track in the otherwise glori-ous history of science, even if the track lasted for almost two thousand years. At best, their unscientific, cryptic, and contradictory attitudes might qualify al-chemists as bedfellows of the fine arts, as an inspirational source for mystic, an-ti-scientific movements. Modern sci-ence, on the other hand, as epitomized, for instance, by the latest nanotechnol-ogy, is now on the brink of making the illusionary dreams of the alchemists be-come real: wealth, longevity, and even the laboratory creation of life. While such a view flatters and satisfies the modern ego, it does everything to mis-understand science and its role in socie-ty and lets the propagators of science and technology run again and again into the same old societal troubles
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有