摘要：Straipsnyje ap.velgiama buvusio Klaip.dos kra.to auk.taiti.kosios dalies (Klaip.dos kra.to auk.tai.i.) dabartin. tarmin. situacija. Tyrimas atliktas 2003–20 05 met. ekspedicij. d uomenimis. Daugiausi a d.mesio straipsnyje skiriama fonetikos ypatyb.ms, atk reip iamas d.mesys . kai kuriuos būdingesnius morfologijos bei sintaks.s bruo.us.Tarmini. .ra.. analiz. parod., kad tradicin. Klai -p.dos kra.to vakar. auk.tai.i. tarm. .iose vietov.se negr..tamai pakitusi. Vykstant .vairiems migracijos procesams .ioje teritorijoje keli. kalbini. bendruo -meni. pagrindu susiformavo naujas tarminis klodas, kurio kitimas tebevyksta iki .iol. Naujojo dialekto i. esm.s negalima priskirti n. vienai i. dabartini. lietuvi. tarmi., .ia konkuruoja vakar. auk.tai.i. ir .emai.i. .nekt. ypatyb.s, iki .iol juntama ir vokie.i. kalbos .taka. Buvusi Klai -p.dos kra.to auk.tai.i. teritorija dabartin.s tarm.s po.iūriu n.ra vienalyt. – jos rytinei daliai daugiau b ūding os vakar. au k.tai.i. kaun i.k i. ypat yb.s, vakarin.je dalyje labiau dominuoja .emaiti.kos ypa-tyb.s. Ta.iau yra tam tikr. fonetikos, morfologijos ir sintaks.s ypatybi., vienijan.i. vis. buvus. Klaip.dos kra.to auk.taiti.k.j. plot..
其他摘要：This paper analyses cu rren t dialect situatio n in Auk.taitian part of former region of Klaip.da (Auk.taitians of Klaip.da region). The research was done using data from expeditions of 2003-2005 year. The paper mainly focuses on features of phonetics; a lot of attention is paid to some of more specific morphology and syntax characteristics. The analysis of dialect notes reveals that tradi -tional dialect of west Auk.taitians of Klaip.da region has irreversibly changed. Because of migration proc-esses in this territory new dialectal mine has formed which is mutating till now. The newly formed dialect cannot be assigned to any of existing Lithuanian dialects, west Auk.taitians and .emaitians dialect features compete there and the influence of German language is still noticeable. The territory of Auk.taitians of former Klaip.da region is not monolithic from dialect viewpoint – the east part is more characterised by Kaunian features of west Auk.taitians, west part is dominated by .emaitian specialty. However there are some of phonetical, morphological and syntax features which join togeth -er all of former Klaip.da region Auk.taitian area
