摘要：When a natural disaster hits, the affected households try to cope with its impacts. A variety of coping strategies,from reducing current consumption to disposing of productive assets, may be employed. The latter strategies are especiallyworrisome because they may reduce the capacity of the household to generate income in the future, possibly leading to chronicpoverty. We used the results of a household survey in rural Uganda to ask, first, what coping strategies would tend to be employedin the event of a weather disaster, second, given that multiple strategies can be chosen, in what combinations would they tendto be employed, and, third, given that asset-liquidation strategies can be particularly harmful for the future income prospects ofhouseholds, what determines their uptake. Our survey is one of the largest of its kind, containing over 3000 observations garneredby local workers using smartphone technology. We found that in this rural sample, by far, the most frequently reported choicewould be to sell livestock. This is rather striking because asset-based theories would predict more reliance on strategies likeeating and spending less today, which avoid disposal of productive assets. It may well be that livestock is held as a form ofliquid savings to, among other things, help bounce back from a weather disaster. Although, we did find that other strategies thatmight undermine future prospects were avoided, notably selling land or the home and disrupting the children's education. Oureconometric analysis revealed a fairly rich set of determinants of different subsets of coping strategies. Perhaps most notably,households with a more educated head are much less likely to choose coping strategies involving taking their own children outof education
