It is generally recognized that many non-native speakers of English encounter difficulties in their English academic writing (Cumming, 2006). Major difficulties may occur with grammar, word-choice, and coherence and cohesion (Cumming, 2006; Mohan & Lo, 1985). Consequently, scholars and teachers of English as a foreign and/or second language have developed many different online tools, software, and other resources to facilitate and improve the teaching and learning of academic writing. One example of this type of tool is Erlyn Baack’s website entitled Advanced Composition for Non-Native Speakers of English (eslbee.com). The purpose of this website is to help non-native speakers of English at the intermediate level to improve their use of the essential elements of academic composition. These elements include organizing ideas, forming appropriate paragraph and essay structures, and practicing the basics of sentence and paragraph structure. As is the case for all English teaching and learning websites, this website must be evaluated in order to measure its effectiveness for teachers and learners (Murray & McPherson, 2004; Wilkinson, Bennett & Oliver, 1997; Yang & Chan 2008). Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to review this website (i.e., eslbee.com). In this review, I provide a brief description of eslbee.com, and then I use Liu, Liu, and Hwang’s (2010) ESL website evaluation guidelines, in addition to elements of a new literacies definition, as a framework for a concrete and straightforward evaluation.