We consider Reed-Solomon (RS) codes whose evaluation points belong to a subfield, and give a linear-algebraic list decoding algorithm that can correct a fraction of errors approaching the code distance, while pinning down the candidate messages to a well-structured affine space of dimension a constant factor smaller than the code dimension.By pre-coding the message polynomials into a subspace-evasive set, we get a Monte Carlo construction of a subcode of Reed-Solomon codes that can be list decoded from a fraction (1−R−) of errors in polynomial time (for any fixed 0">0) with a list size of O(1) . Our methods extend to algebraic-geometric (AG) codes, leading to a similar claim over constant-sized alphabets. This matches parameters of recent results based on folded variants of RS and AG codes, but our construction here gives subcodes of Reed-Solomon and AG codes themselves (albeit with restrictions on the evaluation points).
Further, the underlying algebraic idea also extends nicely to Gabidulin's construction of rank-metric codes based on linearized polynomials. This gives the first construction of positive rate rank-metric codes list decodable beyond half the distance, and in fact gives codes of rate R list decodable up to the optimal (1−R−) fraction of rank errors. A similar claim holds for the closely related subspace codes studied by Koetter and Kschischang.We introduce a new notion called "subspace designs" as another way to pre-code messages and prune the subspace of candidate solutions. Using these, we also get a *deterministic* construction of a polynomial time list decodable subcode of RS codes. By using a cascade of several subspace designs, we extend our approach to AG codes, which gives the first deterministic construction of an algebraic code family of rate R with efficient list decoding from 1−R− fraction of errors over an alphabet of constant size (that depends only on ). The list size bound is almost a constant (governed by log (block length)), and the code can be constructed in quasi-polynomial time. Finding more efficient constructions of subspace designs is an interesting problem in pseudorandomness arising out of our work.