摘要：“In most academic libraries, the largest user-group, the students, have the least input into library decisions and policies directly affecting them.” This statement is from an article by Candace R. Benefiel, Wendi Arant, and Elaine Gass, “A New Dialogue: A Student Advisory Committee in an Academic Library,” published The Journal of Academic Librarianship, volume 25, issue 2. Thirteen years later, that claim is probably still true in most academic law libraries. We’re all too busy planning workshops, updating our websites, and deciding between print or electronic to have much time to ask our students—the ones those efforts are most often for—what they think about it all.
