首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月28日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:A Resource Allocation Modelfor Tiger Habitat Protection
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Susmita Dasgupta ; Dan Hammer ; Robin Kraft
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Management and Sustainability
  • 印刷版ISSN:1925-4725
  • 电子版ISSN:1925-4733
  • 出版年度:2014
  • 卷号:4
  • 期号:3
  • 页码:16
  • DOI:10.5539/jms.v4n3p16
  • 出版社:Canadian Center of Science and Education
  • 摘要:Conservation of habitats is critical for survival of endangered tigers. This paper develops a resource allocation
    model for tiger habitat protection incorporating information about threats to particular tiger subspecies, the
    quality of remaining habitat areas, the observed effectiveness of habitat protection by country, and the potential
    costs of protection projects for 74 habitats in Asia. Implementation of the model moves through two stages. The
    first stage employs user-specified weights to combine numerous subindices into composite indices of species
    threat, habitat quality, potential project costs and protection effectiveness. The second stage employs additional
    user-specified weights to combine the composite indices into priority scores and potential project budget shares
    for all 74 habitat areas.
    Exploration of model results suggests that changes in user-specified weights can have very significant
    consequences for habitat priority scores. Illustrative scenarios indicate that no single priority ordering can be
    prescribed in such a diverse setting, and actual priorities will depend on the preferences of decision-makers, as
    revealed in the weights assigned to species threats, habitat quality, cost elements, and effective protection. At the
    same time, the model can make a useful contribution by identifying priority orderings that are consistent with
    different sets of preferences. And it can inform policy discussions by allowing for extended exploration of
    alternative strategies, along with providing feedback to decision makers about the implicit preferences associated
    with their resource allocation decisions.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有