首页    期刊浏览 2025年06月21日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Preliminary Testing for Normality: Is This a Good Practice?
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Keselman, H. J ; Othman, Abdul R ; Wilcox, Rand R
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods
  • 出版年度:2013
  • 卷号:12
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:2
  • 出版社:Wayne State University
  • 摘要:Normality is a distributional requirement of classical test statistics. In order for the test statistic to provide valid results leading to sound and reliable conclusions this requirement must be satisfied. In the not too distant past, it was claimed that violations of normality would not likely jeopardize scientific findings (See Hsu & Feldt, 1969; Lunney, 1970). Recent revelations suggest otherwise (See e.g., Micceri, 1989; Keselman, Huberty, Lix et al., 1998; Erceg-Hurn, Wilcox, & Keselman, 2013; Wilcox and Keselman, 2003; Wilcox, 2012a, b). Unfortunately the data obtained in psychological investigations rarely, if ever, meet the requirement of normally distributed data (Micceri, 1989; Wilcox, 2012a, b). Consequently, it could be the case that the results from many of the investigations conducted in psychology provide invalid results. Accordingly, authors recommend that researchers attempt to assess the validity of assuming data are normal in form prior to conducting a test of significance (Erceg-Hurn, et al., 2013; Keselman, et al., 1998). Present evidence suggests that a popular fit-statistic, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test does a poor job of evaluating whether data are normal. Our investigation based on this statistic and other fit-statistics provides a more favorable picture of preliminary testing for normality.
  • 关键词:Assessing normality; fit statistics; g-and-h non-normal skewed and kurtotic data; contaminated mixed-normal distributions; outlying value(s); Likert scales
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有