首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月01日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:WHOSE FAULT?—DAUBERT, THE NAS REPORT, AND THE NOTION OF ERROR IN FORENSIC SCIENCE
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Risinger, D. Michael
  • 期刊名称:Fordham Urban Law Journal
  • 出版年度:2010
  • 卷号:38
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:519
  • 出版社:Fordham Law School
  • 摘要:The notion of “error” and “error rates” is central both to the Daubert opinion and to the recent NAS Report on the strengths and weaknesses of forensic science in the United States. I will not be attempting a full-scale examination of the concept of error in this paper, however, I believe there are some observations that can be made that may be helpful in domesticating in helpful ways the notion of error as it might apply to forensic science expertise. I conclude that we should work to improve diagnosticity for old processes, or to invent or adopt new ones with improved diagnosticity. But failing that, we must do research on (and cooperate with research on) the actual diagnosticity of current process, most of whose diagnosticity in general, and even more importantly, as to each subtask, and under the conditions of real practice is not currently known.
  • 关键词:forensic science; error; NAS report; Daubert; diagnosticity
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有