首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月19日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:A theoretical framework for early human studies: uncertainty, intervention ensembles, and boundaries
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Jonathan Kimmelman
  • 期刊名称:Trials
  • 印刷版ISSN:1745-6215
  • 电子版ISSN:1745-6215
  • 出版年度:2012
  • 卷号:13
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:173
  • DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-13-173
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:Clinical development of novel therapeutics begins with a coordinated sequence of early phase clinical trials. Such early human studies confront a series of methodological and ethical challenges. In what follows, I propose a theoretical framework for early human studies aimed at informing the negotiation of these challenges. At the outset of clinical development, researchers confront a virtually undifferentiated landscape of uncertainty with respect to three variables: outcomes, their probability of occurrence, and operation dimensions needed to effectuate favorable outcomes. Early human trials transform this uncertain landscape into one where there are grounds for belief about risk and benefit for various combined operation dimensions. To accomplish this, studies set out with two aims. First, they identify a set of operation dimensions that, when combined as a package (intervention ensemble), elicits a reasonable probability of a target outcome. Second, they define the boundaries of dimension values within an intervention ensemble. This latter aim entails exposing at least some volunteers in early studies to treatments that are inactive or excessive. I provide examples that illustrate the way early human studies discover and delimit intervention ensembles, and close by offering some implications of this framework for ethics, methodology, and efficiency in clinical development of new interventions.
  • 关键词:Phase 1 ; Phase 2 ; Research ethics ; Risk ; Uncertainty ; Dose escalation ; Drug development
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有