首页    期刊浏览 2024年07月07日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Evidence summaries (decision boxes) to prepare clinicians for shared decision-making with patients: a mixed methods implementation study
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Anik MC Giguere ; Michel Labrecque ; R Brian Haynes
  • 期刊名称:Implementation Science
  • 印刷版ISSN:1748-5908
  • 电子版ISSN:1748-5908
  • 出版年度:2014
  • 卷号:9
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:144
  • DOI:10.1186/s13012-014-0144-6
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:Decision boxes (Dboxes) provide clinicians with research evidence about management options for medical questions that have no single best answer. Dboxes fulfil a need for rapid clinical training tools to prepare clinicians for clinician-patient communication and shared decision-making. We studied the barriers and facilitators to using the Dbox information in clinical practice. We used a mixed methods study with sequential explanatory design. We recruited family physicians, residents, and nurses from six primary health-care clinics. Participants received eight Dboxes covering various questions by email (one per week). For each Dbox, they completed a web questionnaire to rate clinical relevance and cognitive impact and to assess the determinants of their intention to use what they learned from the Dbox to explain to their patients the advantages and disadvantages of the options, based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Following the 8-week delivery period, we conducted focus groups with clinicians and interviews with clinic administrators to explore contextual factors influencing the use of the Dbox information. One hundred clinicians completed the web surveys. In 54% of the 496 questionnaires completed, they reported that their practice would be improved after having read the Dboxes, and in 40%, they stated that they would use this information for their patients. Of those who would use the information for their patients, 89% expected it would benefit their patients, especially in that it would allow the patient to make a decision more in keeping with his/her personal circumstances, values, and preferences. They intended to use the Dboxes in practice (mean 5.6 ± 1.2, scale 1–7, with 7 being “high”), and their intention was significantly related to social norm, perceived behavioural control, and attitude according to the TPB (P < 0.0001). In focus groups, clinicians mentioned that co-interventions such as patient decision aids and training in shared decision-making would facilitate the use of the Dbox information. Some participants would have liked a clear “bottom line” statement for each Dbox and access to printed Dboxes in consultation rooms. Dboxes are valued by clinicians. Tailoring of Dboxes to their needs would facilitate their implementation in practice.
  • 关键词:Clinical practice guidelines ; Knowledge translation ; Decision support ; Evidence-based practice ; Barriers ; Patient-centred care ; User experience ; Continuing professional development ; Communication competency
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有