首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月28日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Efficacy of osteopathic manipulation as an adjunctive treatment for hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Donald R Noll ; Brian F Degenhardt ; Thomas F Morley
  • 期刊名称:Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care
  • 印刷版ISSN:1750-4732
  • 电子版ISSN:1750-4732
  • 出版年度:2010
  • 卷号:4
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:2
  • DOI:10.1186/1750-4732-4-2
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:The Multicenter Osteopathic Pneumonia Study in the Elderly (MOPSE) is a registered, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) as an adjunctive treatment in elderly patients with pneumonia. 406 subjects aged ≥ 50 years hospitalized with pneumonia at 7 community hospitals were randomized using concealed allocation to conventional care only (CCO), light-touch treatment (LT), or OMT groups. All subjects received conventional treatment for pneumonia. OMT and LT groups received group-specific protocols for 15 minutes, twice daily until discharge, cessation of antibiotics, respiratory failure, death, or withdrawal from the study. The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), time to clinical stability, and a symptomatic and functional recovery score. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (n = 387) found no significant differences between groups. Per-protocol (PP) analysis (n = 318) found a significant difference between groups (P = 0.01) in LOS. Multiple comparisons indicated a reduction in median LOS (95% confidence interval) for the OMT group (3.5 [3.2-4.0] days) versus the CCO group (4.5 [3.9-4.9] days), but not versus the LT group (3.9 [3.5-4.8] days). Secondary outcomes of duration of intravenous antibiotics and treatment endpoint were also significantly different between groups (P = 0.05 and 0.006, respectively). Duration of intravenous antibiotics and death or respiratory failure were lower for the OMT group versus the CCO group, but not versus the LT group. ITT analysis found no differences between groups. PP analysis found significant reductions in LOS, duration of intravenous antibiotics, and respiratory failure or death when OMT was compared to CCO. Given the prevalence of pneumonia, adjunctive OMT merits further study.
  • 关键词:Group Assignment ; Conventional Care ; Clinical Stability ; Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment ; Treatment Endpoint
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有