首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月15日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:An exploratory study into the impact and acceptability of formatively used progress testing in postgraduate obstetrics and gynaecology
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Marja G. K. Dijksterhuis ; Lambert W. T. Schuwirth ; Didi D. M. Braat
  • 期刊名称:Perspectives on Medical Education
  • 印刷版ISSN:2212-2761
  • 电子版ISSN:2212-277X
  • 出版年度:2013
  • 卷号:2
  • 期号:3
  • 页码:126-141
  • DOI:10.1007/s40037-013-0063-2
  • 出版社:Springer Verlag
  • 摘要:Part of recent reforms of postgraduate medical training in the Netherlands is the introduction of formatively intended knowledge testing or progress testing. We previously evaluated the construct validity and reliability of postgraduate progress testing. However, when assessment is intended to be formative, the acceptability of the test (scores) and the educational impact that is achieved are at least as important in the utility of this assessment format. We developed a questionnaire targeted at both educational supervisors and postgraduate trainees, containing questions on general acceptability, educational impact and acceptability of test content. 90 % of trainees and 84 % of educational supervisors completed the questionnaire. The general acceptability of formatively used progress testing is good; however, the self-reported educational impact is limited. Furthermore, trainees query the validity of test content. Formatively intended progress testing is well accepted; however the impact is limited. We discuss the importance of feedback quality and the effect of grading. Furthermore we start a debate on whether, for a genuine effect on learning, formative assessment should have consequences, either by entwining the assessment with the training programme or by linking the assessment to a summative standard.
  • 关键词:Postgraduate ;Formative assessment ;Progress test ;Acceptability ;Educational impact
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有