期刊名称：Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication
印刷版ISSN：1944-3676
出版年度：2014
卷号：9
期号：1
页码：9
出版社：Kansas State University Libraries
摘要：This paper is a defense of Reformed Empiricism, especially against those critics who take Reformed Empiricism to be a viable account of empirical rationality only if it avails itself of certain rationalist assumptions that are inconsistent with empiricism. I argue against three broad types of criticism that are found in the current literature, and propose a way of characterising Gupta’s constraints for any model of experience as analytic of empiricism itself, avoiding the charge by some (e.g. McDowell, Berker, and Schafer) who think that the constraints are substantive.
