首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月26日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Three perspectives on motivation and multicriteria assessment of organic food systems
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Jeppe Læssøe ; Anders Kruse Ljungdalh ; Hugo F. Alrøe
  • 期刊名称:Ecology and Society
  • 印刷版ISSN:1708-3087
  • 电子版ISSN:1708-3087
  • 出版年度:2014
  • 卷号:19
  • 期号:3
  • DOI:10.5751/ES-06397-190307
  • 出版社:The Resilience Alliance
  • 摘要:Organic food systems are based on a complex of value criteria that often are not explicitly considered when agents think, communicate, and make decisions concerning organic food. Multicriteria assessment (MCA) refers to a group of tools that help the user to tackle such highly complex issues. The question is how an MCA tool should be designed to facilitate reflections, communication, and decision making in relation to organic food systems. A key issue is motivation. There are several divergent theories of motivation, and the question cannot be adequately answered by using any single theory. We discuss an economic, a psychosocial, and a relational perspective on motivation and MCA. Using the example of a consumer assessing and choosing products in the supermarket, the economic conception of motivation offers a focus on decision-making processes. The psychosocial approach to motivation draws attention to the influence of cognitive structures and experience-based emotional drivers. Finally, the relational approach stresses that motivation is situated in the relations between agents. We discuss how the three perspectives converge and diverge regarding the purpose of using an MCA tool, the scope of the MCA, the strategic focus, and challenges and potentials associated with an MCA tool. Through this multiple-perspective approach, the general idea of MCA is expanded and elaborated to refine the design of an MCA tool for organic food systems.
  • 关键词:motivation; multicriteria assessment (MCA); organic food
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有