首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月20日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:A Comparison of Obstetric and Non-obstetric Anesthesia Medical Accidents
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Kim, Keonsik ; Kwon, Mooil ; Lee, Bongjae
  • 期刊名称:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
  • 印刷版ISSN:2005-6419
  • 出版年度:2008
  • 卷号:54
  • 期号:4
  • 页码:431-436
  • DOI:10.4097/kjae.2008.54.4.431
  • 语种:Korean
  • 出版社:The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists,
  • 摘要:Background

    Obstetrics departments are unique and medical accidents in obstetric anesthesia may show differences from non-obstetric anesthesia accidents. So we compared both groups in several aspects for the understanding their characters and decreasing their incidence.

    Methods

    Obstetric anesthesia accidents (n = 30) and non-obstetric anesthesia accidents (n = 106) were compared in 6 categories (patient age, anesthesia method, damaging event, anesthetic care, severity of injury, payment).

    Results

    The most common complications in obstetric anesthesia accidents were maternal death (40%), maternal brain damage (13%), and maternal nerve injury (13%). In contrast, the most common complications in non-obstetric anesthesia accidents were patient death (62%), and patient brain damage (27%). The severity of injury score of obstetric anesthesia adverse outcomes was analogous to that of non-obstetric anesthesia adverse outcomes, but the payment for obstetric accidents was significantly greater than that for non-obstetric accidents.

    Conclusions

    Obstetric anesthesia accidents revealed distinct medical risk profiles, such as patient age, damaging event, severity of injury, and payment. Special care should be used when anesthetizing younger women and caring for a newborn in obstetric anesthesia. More studies and analyses are necessary to prevent obstetric anesthesia accidents.

  • 关键词:anesthesia adverse outcome; medical accident; obstetric anesthesia
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有