首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月24日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparison of Clinical Results between Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy and Brush Photorefractive Keratectomy
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Kang, Hyunseung ; Choe, Chul Myong ; Choi, Tae Hoon
  • 期刊名称:Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
  • 印刷版ISSN:0378-6471
  • 出版年度:2014
  • 卷号:55
  • 期号:9
  • 页码:1284-1290
  • DOI:10.3341/jkos.2014.55.9.1284
  • 语种:Korean
  • 出版社:The Korean Ophthalmological Society
  • 摘要:Purpose

    To compare the results of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (trans PRK) and brush-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (brush PRK) for the treatment of myopia.

    Methods

    A total of 146 eyes from 78 patients who received brush PRK or trans PRK with the Schwind Amaris laser platform were included in the present study. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) at postoperative 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were compared between the 2 groups as well as epithelial healing time.

    Results

    The mean time to complete epithelial healing was 3.27 ± 0.75 days in the trans PRK group and 3.67 ± 0.93 days in the brush PRK group ( P < 0.05). At 1 week after surgery, UDVA recovered more rapidly after trans PRK than brush PRK (brush PRK: 0.13 ± 0.12 log MAR units, trans PRK: 0.09 ± 0.08 log MAR units, P < 0.05), however, UDVA was not significantly different at 1, 3, 6, and, 12 months postoperatively between the 2 groups.

    Conclusions

    Re-epithelialization and visual recovery were faster in the trans PRK group while visual outcome and postoperative complications were equivalent to the brush PRK group.

  • 关键词:Brush-assisted photorefractive keratectomy; Epithelial healing time; Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有