摘要：The Oklahoma Constitution retains its original and historic character as a combination of constitutional and statutory provisions. This article traces the Constitution's evolution through the use of the initiative and referendum processes and sets that evolution in the context of the state's political culture. It concludes by considering efforts to reform the Constitution and the reasons why they have failed. In brief, the article finds that Oklahomans have not recognized the importance of the distinction between fundamental and statutory law. Constitutional reform has been stymied by a variety of political forces that prefer an accessible constitution and fragmented governmental authority to the efficiencies that might result from a streamlined constitutional order. From the early Progressives to modern conservatives, Oklahomans have distrusted government and their Constitution reflects that fact.
