首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月30日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Editorial
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Karin Dahlberg ; Eva Gjengedal ; Målfrid Råheim
  • 期刊名称:International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
  • 电子版ISSN:1748-2631
  • 出版年度:2010
  • 卷号:5
  • 期号:4
  • DOI:10.3402/qhw.v5i4.5800
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Taylor & Francis
  • 摘要:The scientific interest in health and well-being demands well-founded research strategies in order for the complexities, the depth, and the many nuances of health-related phenomena to be thoroughly explored. Often, but not always,1 the scientific/ philosophical inspiration is made clear. In many qualitative research approaches, phenomenology and/or hermeneutics serve as the ontological, epistemological, and methodological foundation. Some authors employ phenomenological approaches, philosophically referring to Husserl or Merleau-Ponty and methodologically to, for example, Giorgi. Others describe their approaches as hermeneutical, referring philosophically to Heidegger, Ricoeur, or Gadamer and methodologically to, for example, van Manen. The essential distinction is description versus interpretation. Phenomenological supporters usually emphasise description while the hermeneutical supporters emphasise interpretation.(Published: 30 December 2010)Citation: Int J Qualitative Stud Health Well-being 2010, 5: 5800 - DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v5i4.5800
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有