摘要：Opposition at Knud Jeppesen’s defence of his thesis “Græder ikke saa saare. Studier i Mikabogens sigte” (Aarhus Universitetsforlag 1987). Jeppesen advocates that the idea of the Book of Micah obtained its final shape through a redaction in Babylon during the exile. The criticism concentrates upon the question whether earlier redactions of the Micah traditions (between 8 th and 6 th centuries) had impact on later (exilic or post-exilic) redactions and thus would be of importance for the understanding of the final structure of the Book of Micah.
