-
The Regulation of the Security of Electronic Information in Lithuania and Russia: the Comparative Aspects Abstract. Cybercrime has become a global phenomenon, which is causing more harm to individual citizens, organizations, society and the state. Most countries in the world compare cybercrime with such offences as terrorism and drug trafficking due to its risks and profitability. Therefore, the legal regulation of cybercrime is one of the most relevant problems in the world, including Lithuania and our neighbouring country, Russia. So far cybercrime analysis in scientific literature has been rather limited. We have not succeeded in finding a comparison between the regulatory practices of cybercrime in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Lithuania in any of the references.The main goal of the thesis paper is to analyse and to compare the electronic information security legal framework of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Lithuania.The article consists of two parts. The first part deals with the comparative aspect of strategic documents—the program governing electronic information protection in Lithuania and the Russian Federation.The second part of the article examines the comparative aspect of electronic information protection legislative, legal framework Republic of Lithuania and the Russian Federation. It was found that at the moment in both countries there is a strategic document which defines the planned state policy in this area, but the lack of a Lithuanian Law which can fully and consistently regulate social relations in relation to electronic information security.Several different approaches have been used in the research. The authors have used a comparative method to investigate the Lithuanian and Russian legal framework for the security of electronic information. Empirical analysis of legal documents was used to determine the legal regulation of the security of electronic information in Lithuania and Russia. Legal acts of the Republic of Lithuania and the Russian Federation have been analysed. Having analysed the official documents, the method allows identification and description of the relationship between the valid legal regulations accurately. Using literature resources the authors have used the deductive method, which allows drawing sufficiently reliable conclusions. The latest scientific literature and dictionaries have been used to study the definitions.
作 者：Darius Štitilis ;Valdas Klišauskas
出 处：Social Technologies. 2012 ;2(2).
出 版 社：Mykolas Romeris University
文 章 ID：84624165
-
作 者：Darius Štitilis ;Paulius Pakutinskas ;Inga Dauparaitė 等
出 处：Social Technologies. 2011 ;1(1).
出 版 社：Mykolas Romeris University
文 章 ID：84624173
-
作 者：Darius Štitilis ;Paulis Pakutinskas ;Inga Malinauskaitė
出 处：Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. 2016 ;4(2):174-182.doi:10.9770/jesi.2016.4.2(5)
出 版 社：Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center
文 章 ID：252052503
-
作 者：Irmantas Rotomskis ;Darius Štitilis
出 处：Informacijos Mokslai. 2008 ;42:84-90.doi:10.15388/Im.2008.0.3438
出 版 社：Vilnius University Press
文 章 ID：253545718
-
作 者：Irmantas Rotomskis ;Darius Štitilis
出 处：Informacijos Mokslai. 2009 ;50:233-239.doi:10.15388/Im.2009.0.3232
出 版 社：Vilnius University Press
文 章 ID：253545822
-
作 者：Darius Štitilis ;Marius Laurinaitis
出 处：Informacijos Mokslai. 2009 ;50:240-247.doi:10.15388/Im.2009.0.3231
出 版 社：Vilnius University Press
文 章 ID：253545823
-
作 者：Darius Štitilis ;Rolandas Krikščiūnas ;Rimantas Petrauskas
出 处：Jurisprudence. 2005 ;67(59).
出 版 社：Mykolas Romeris University
文 章 ID：258576677
